November 29, 2022: Grey’s Anatomy – Radiographic Interpretation of Heart Disease

RACE Program #:

949292

RACE-Approved CE

1 Hour

Cost

Free to ELITE Members; otherwise $50/1-hour webinar

Part of Certificate Program(s):

Is it cardiac? Is it respiratory? HELP!

In this 1-hour, VETgirl small animal webinar, Dr. Ryan Fries, DACVIM (Cardiology) will review the radiographic interpretation of real-life cardiac and non-cardiac cases. Tune it to learn what radiographic features are the most helpful in diagnosing preclinical heart disease in dogs and cats! Do I always need an echo or rads?

Have Questions about VETgirl Webinars?

Live Webinar FAQ

How do I get my webinar CE credit?

Not a VETgirl ELITE member? Get your learning on with the #1 veterinary CE resource – clinically relevant, practical, and accessible 24/7 on your own time! Don’t miss out – click HERE to check out your options, including our new  14-day, no-commitment ELITE Trial.

This program has been approved for continuing education credit in jurisdictions which recognize AAVSB RACE approval; however, participants should be aware that some boards have limitations on the number of hours accepted in certain categories and/or restrictions on certain methods of delivery of continuing education.

This webinar is for individual viewing only; VETgirl webinars are not designed nor meant to be viewed in a group setting due to RACE-CE audit purposes. Inappropriate sharing or viewing of the webinar may result in revoking of membership.

The official version of the content is in the original language. Translations are not guaranteed to be exact or accurate. Some content, such as images, videos, and PDFs, may not translate accurately. Discrepancies in translations are not binding and have no legal effect. The user assumes the risk of any inaccuracies or errors in the translation.

  1. Hi there! Quick question regarding radiograph positioning for cardiac patients. I’ve been told in the past that DV views are better for assessing cardiac structures in general and that if specifically evaluating for cardiac disease, to opt for a DV instead of a VD. Is this true? Often I end up taking DV rads out of concern for respiratory compromise anyway (assuming they’re stable enough to even go on the table). Just curious as to the pros/cons of VD vs. DV for cardiac and respiratory cases.

    Thanks! – Dan

  2. All the cardiologists I have worked with have preferred DV because you can see the pulmonary vessels better, which is best when assessing for congestive heart failure. It is also less stressful for dyspneic patients to take a DV since they don’t have to lay on their back. On the opposite side, many radiologists prefer VD when looking for primary lung disease or metastasis.

    I don’t think it truly matters that much as long as you are consistent with the views you take so that you can compare between current and previous studies.

  3. This was a great, practical presentation! Thank you for help on common issues that I see in practice. This presentation was well organized and the speaker was a good communicatior!

  4. An excellent presentation to brush up on radiographic cardiac anatomy. Dr. Fries did a great job of providing clinically relevant information.

Only VETgirl members can leave comments. Sign In or Join VETgirl now!